Tuesday, March 17, 2020

Economics today essays

Economics today essays My last summary had up through General welfare so for 189-192 it will start with Insure Domestic Tranquility: Due to several rebellions against the weak and fledgling U.S. government, several acts had to be taken so that it would not happen again. These including and not limited to acts on uniform bankruptcy and taxation. All legislative powers: This passage basically speaks of how the legislative branch is given supremacy over all other factions of government. This group of men represented the will of the people and therefore where their voice. However over time the other 2 factions who have engorged themselves have divided most of its power. Lockes principles: Locke had good views of principle and of legislation. Each of his 3 views expressed a religious and/or common sense thought about the legislature. 1. The legislature cannot transfer its powers to others and thus it is the voice of the people. 2. The legislature may only be as great and powerful as its people. 3. And most importantly, the legislature may only make laws that coincide or abide with the laws of God. Throughout the last few years America has strayed from the 3 principles set forth by our fore fathers (enunciated by Locke). Each of his 3 principles has in its own way been uniquely perverted and twisted into something not intended by the founders. The power has been divided, the legislature has changed its sort of power, and sadly the laws no longer always follow the law of God. The principle that the legislatures power could and should not be transferred has been utterly decimated. The legislature numbering some 400+ odd men has taken a back seat to 1 man (executive) and the 9 person supreme court. This branch that supposedly represents the people has been given unfair and unequal representation for the people. Instead the power it once had is now shared with 10 other people. Now after that last broken principle you would figure tha ...

Sunday, March 1, 2020

Not That Big of a Deal

Not That Big of a Deal Not That Big of a Deal Not That Big of a Deal By Maeve Maddox A reader dislikes this commonly heard idiom: This is a losing battle, I’m sure. I constantly hear – and am annoyed by – people expressing reservations about something with phrases like â€Å"It’s not that big of a deal,† or â€Å"It’s not that good of a movie† etc.   As far as I know, the â€Å"of† is superfluous; you just say â€Å"not that big a deal† or â€Å"not that good a movie.†Ã‚   Adding the â€Å"of† seems unnecessary and grating to me.  I’d be interested in your thoughts on this point. The reader is correct in feeling that the â€Å"of† in â€Å"not that big of a deal† is superfluous. As one of the writers at The Grammarphobia blog points out, â€Å"An extra word can be justified if it serves an emphatic or supportive purpose, as in â€Å"first time ever†Ã‚  or â€Å"three different times.† Adding of to â€Å"not that big a deal† and â€Å"not that good a movie† serves no emphatic or supportive purpose. Nevertheless, â€Å"big of a deal† is commonly heard in spoken English and, judging by the Ngram Viewer, seems to be creeping into print. The first year the phrase â€Å"big of a deal† occurs on the Ngram Viewer is 1945. It doesn’t make much of a showing in print until the 1980s, when it shoots upward. The usage may have originated by analogy with the standard construction in which a noun is described by another noun (noun + â€Å"of a† + noun): I have a whale of a tale to tell you, Lads. San Andreas is a disaster of a movie. My girlfriend has been dating a loser of a boyfriend. The dog has made a hell of a mess in the garage. The pattern adjective + â€Å"of a† + noun is also standard- some of the time. For example, some adjectives of quantity are used in this way: One effect of this mechanism is to make it extremely difficult for third party or independent candidates ever to make much of a showing in the Electoral College. But for many researchers, having equal numbers of women and men in the scientific ranks is less of a priority than having a system that is fair and furthers science itself.   Thats more of a commitment than  many emerging market investors want to make. Youd think that  people  would  have had enough of  silly love songs. Big and good are adjectives of quality. â€Å"It wasn’t that good of a supper† is all right as dialect, but its nonstandard. The big of a deal construction may have migrated from dialect to the ranks of colloquialism, but it still has no place in written English, other than in dialogue or direct quotation. Want to improve your English in five minutes a day? Get a subscription and start receiving our writing tips and exercises daily! Keep learning! Browse the Expressions category, check our popular posts, or choose a related post below:"Because Of" and "Due To" How to spell "in lieu of"Dozen: Singular or Plural?